Tigers wear amber alternate shorts at home v. Southampton

By our reckoning, City hadn’t worn amber shorts for a home league match since 1965 until last night, when League leaders Southampton arrived at the KC Stadium with only their black primary shorts. Rather than make the Saints wear a set of our shorts, City deferred and wore the amber alternates with the regular black socks for the 2-0 defeat.

It created an odd look, perhaps we should have gone with the amber alternate socks too, but the kit inventory is not stored at the KC Stadium, rather at the Millhouse Woods Lane training complex and bused in for each game, so it is understandable that during a quick dash to Cottingham only the alternate shorts were collected.

City have previous when it comes to choosing to change themselves rather than lend a visiting opponent some kit, back in August 2004 Bradford tipped up with only black shirts with amber trim, so City wore the sky blue away shirts and socks with black shorts. The Tigers lost that game too, maybe we should force the opponent to wear some of our kit after all.

As well as wearing the amber shorts twice in a season against Southampton (having used them in the game at St. Mary’s in November) City have now worn them in back to back games, as they were used with the amber socks in the 0-0 draw at Crystal Palace on Saturday.

 

2 replies
  1. EricGeneric
    EricGeneric says:

    Do you know if it was a decision by the referee, or if the Hull players/manager/kit man wanted the change?

    Funnily enough, it didn’t seem to be a problem when Southampton travelled to the New Den last weekend. http://i44.tinypic.com/1ikh34.jpg

    As you mention in your write-up, maybe Southampton should have had to wear the Hull change shorts? I mean, it is the away teams fault for not turning up with the correct kit. That used to happen most of the time back in the day, why do you think it seems to be the home team changing now?

    I have a feeling it might be that in 2012, teams wearing different brands is more of an issue than it was in the 1990s. What do you think?

    By the way, just wanted to say, I’m not even a Hull fan and I love the website!

    Keep up the good work 🙂

    Reply
  2. SombreEthyl
    SombreEthyl says:

    Don’t know who’s decision it was, we’ll text the kitman and see what response we get. The brand switching point is a valid one, though it has happened before, City wore Newcastle’s adidas shorts and socks with their own Umbro shirts in 2008.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *