The 2012/13 away kit : Some early thoughts

The 2012/13 adidas away kit was finally revealed this morning and goes on sale Friday.   HCK’s JGHull and SombreEthyl  offer their initial thoughts…

SombreEthyl

I’ve liked all of the away kits that adidas have produced for City, but this is by far the best. It’s simple and unfussy, sleek and a little bit sexy. I’m in favour of wearing your primary colours as often as you can away from home to put the club’s visual identity on show when on the road. The beauty of having a black away kit is you can wear it as many times as you like and you’re still showcasing black and amber (or amber and black, that was the order it was always described in when I was growing up).

The 2003/04 black away kit was sometimes worn just for the sake of it rather than because a colour clash necessitated it, at Rochdale, at Swansea, at Yeovil (in which it became a truly iconic City kit) but there was little complaint, because it looked good and was still our regular colours, albeit in reverse order.

In 2010/11 we mixed and matched elements of home and away kit and it didn’t look quite right as the shade of amber on the away kit was slightly deeper than on the home to contrast better with the white. With this kit, kitman John Eyre can mix and match all he likes and it’ll still look fine, we’ve already seen City wear the alternate amber shorts in pre-season, I’d not be averse to pairing amber shorts with the black shirt and socks on occasion (such as at Sheffield Wednesday or Bolton). I’m also happy that a black away kit means we retain the Argie blue away duds for another year as the 3rd kit.

If I’m being really picky, the shirt collar is a bit drab, I’d have liked some contrast amber on it (I’ve always favoured this style of wrapover collar) but it really doesn’t matter. The only real caveat is, as expected, the sponsor, but in this case it wouldn’t put me off buying one, which speaks volumes about the kit. If anyone discovers the right washer temperature to get the sponsor to peel off, do let us know, in the meantime we can always stand cross-armed like Faye and Proschwitz in the launch photo. Verdict: Awesome.

JGHull

Initial thoughts are that the shirt looks ace. I’m a white away kit man really (with the adidas all white away kit from the first year of our deal with them being a beauty) but as a periodic break from tradition, this gets my approval.

The amber panelling under the arms looks to finish short of the back panelling so assuming the back of the shirt is plain black, there isn’t much to not like. Stylish? Yup. Maintaining tradition? Well, not quite, but it’s amber and black, so sort of yup. Designed so it’s usable as a genuine away kit? Yup. As SombreEthyl says, it would work with the amber shorts so it gives kit guardian Eyre a full range of options of which all get my thumbs up.

Whilst the sponsor is dreadful at least this time around it’s been tastefully treated and actually designed into the shirt rather than slapped on. It’s worth repeating again – we’d really like to know the optimum temperature for the sponsor to peel off without destroying the shirt. I feel an experiment coming on…

Lastly, the artwork launching the away kit is a vast improvement on that which launched the home version. The bleached and poorly cut out work which launched the home shirt (and is still visible on club websites) is not the right way to introduce a kit to the world. A black kit is moody and mean and backlighting the players in this way enhances the kit launch.

I want one. (sans sponsor)

Short story: New sponsor patch for televised Tigers

City’s kit featured a back of shorts sponsor for the first time this season at Blackpool last night. The Tigers wore the Argentina blue away shirt with navy blue shorts against the Tangerines at Bloomfield Road, earning a valuable point courtesy of Matty Fryatt’s late equaliser. The shorts of all outfield players featured a patch advertising Lionel Hutz Neil Hudgell Solicitors for the televised Championship game, but there was no patch on the shorts of keeper Vito Mannone.

The no win, no fee soliciting firm were back of shirt sponsors in 2010/11, while lab equipment company SLS had their logo on the shorts, but until last night there was no shorts sponsor in 2011/12. Whether the patch will appear for the rest of the season or was just in place for a televised game is yet unclear, but from our aesthetics focused point of view, the less sponsors logos on a kit the better.

Festive kit tracking

All three games played over the festive period were notable from a kit-watching standpoint. The Tigers wore the Argentina blue and white away kit at Middlesbrough on Boxing Day, marking only the second time we’d worn the change kit in it’s original guise; with white shorts. The first time we used white shorts was in September in the 1-1 draw at Doncaster, all other uses of the away shirt saw it paired with navy blue shorts.

At Burnley on New Year’s Eve, City used amber socks with the first choice shirt and shorts. Mystifying, as Burnley wear white socks at home, so there was no colour clash. The game at Turf Moor marked the first time The Tigers had worn this combination since playing Bradford City in a pre-season friendly.

The only home game over the festive period was against Derby, in which we wore our full first choice kit. As a mark of respect to Gary Ablett, who died on January 1st following a 16-month battle against non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, all City players wore black armbands. Ablett, a two time league champion (both with Liverpool) and FA Cup winner (once with Liverpool, once with Everton), played 5 games for City while on loan in 1986.

The updated 2011/12 kit tracker is HERE

The season so far…

Despite wearing amber socks for the visit of pink clad Bradford in pre-season, City have maintained a uniform look at home throughout the 2011/12 campaign, as you’d expect. Away from home though, The Tigers have worn three combinations of kit to distinguish themselves from the home side.

The Argentina blue adidas away shirt has, so far, been used four times in Championship competition, but only once with the white shorts designed to match. That once was at Doncaster’s Keepmoat Stadium in late September for the 1-1 draw with Rovers.

The other three instances of away shirt use have seen them worn with navy blue shorts, as the home side favours white home shorts in each case. This occured at Bristol City in September (this was the first regular season outing for the light blue away top), at Nottingham Forest in late October and at Barnsley in early November.

Of course the home kit could have been used in all three of these games as red and white doesn’t clash with our amber and black, but then the only time we’d need to not wear our regular colours is for Watford away, which isn’t until April next year, and it is far too lovely a shirt to only wear once.

Ordinarily City would need to wear the away kit against a home side that wears black shorts (as we did at Donny), but as shown at Derby a set of amber shorts can be used with the home shirt instead, and whereas all-amber can looked washed out, the black stripes of the current primary shirt provide enough contrast to make the amber ‘pop’. We like this look, and wouldn’t mind seeing it again, and since Southampton wear black shorts with their red and white striped shirts, we could see it again later this month when The Tigers travel to St. Mary’s on the 29th.

As for ‘keeper kits, the ‘macaw’ green outfit has been worn the most, our netmen have worn it in 13 games this season. The blue version was used at home to Cardiff and Watford, whereas an all white set was worn at Bristol City and Nottingham Forest, taking our minds back to the white kit sometimes used by ‘Bransholme’s number 1’  Steve Wilson during the 1997/98 campaign.

A full break down of the kits worn so far in 2011/12 can be seen on our outrageously anal Kit Tracker page.

Kit Review: 2007/08 Away

Remember what happened in 2008?

That’s right – Hull City had the finest away strip in their 104 year history.

OK, City also managed to end their long wait for a Wembley appearance in 2008, winning there too, and yes, in doing so they entered the top flight for the first time. However, this kit is pretty memorable too, and would surely have been just as fondly remembered if it didn’t feature in a promotion year, if it had been worn in a “typical City” season of mid-table obscurity.

Before departing to be replaced by Paul Duffen, Adam Pearson signed a 3 year deal with Umbro to design and produce City’s kits. The very same Umbro who supplied (and continue to supply) the national team.

This change in manufacturer is worth remembering – I grew up wearing Pelada, Avec, SuperLeague and Olympic. Admittedly, in the years before 2007, the kit manufacturers were more well known with Patrick and latterly Diadora, but Umbro? This was a large step forward in the kit make credibility stakes.

A template kit “shared” with Glasgow Rangers (the same template was used as their home kit the season previous), City’s away kit was an all white affair. A simple v-necked shirt with a double stripe of amber and black around the neck and from shoulder to shoulder. Under the arms, shaped panels provided ventilation as well as a design feature.

Plain white shorts with diamond detailing on either seam and plain white socks with the double diamond logo of Umbro on the shin completed the kit.

The sponsor was fundamentally the same on both home and away kits, local telecomms company Kingston Communications, but they chose to reflect their different brands with the home shirt carrying the KAROO brand wordmark whilst the away shirt carried the parent company logo and name.

The marketing agency I’m based at were involved in the launch and encouraged by Umbro, ran a ‘teaser’ campaign that gave glimpses of both kits ahead of the summer 2007 launch. I was fortunate to see the kit early and knew it would be a hit. The players modelling it during the “lifestyle” shoot, Damien Delaney, John Welsh and Andy Dawson loved it too.

Above is an unedited, never before seen image from the studio shoot. Photography by Paul Edgar and R&R Studios.

The kit’s first outing was in the always eagerly anticipated annual friendly at North Ferriby, with City wearing the home kit for a half and the away kit for a half. The first competitive game it saw use in was at Coventry and it was later used in games at Blackpool, Wolves, Norwich, Crystal Palace, Watford, Scunny and Sheffield United.

The finest hour for this kit came in one of City’s finest hours (or hour and a halfs if you must) – away at Watford in the Championship Play Off Semi Final first leg, a pulsating game that culminated in a 2-0 Tigers win. The sun shone, we won and we looked superb in doing so.

I’m fortunate to have a signed and framed version of this shirt on the wall next to my desk – that’s how highly I regard this strip. Having said that, if anyone wants to pop round to the office and tell me which signature belongs to whom, feel free!

A memorable season as a City fan for many obvious reasons but for me, one of the reasons I’ll remember it is for the away strip which accompanied *that* historic season.

City in red and black? Bet on it

Most people think of 3rd kits as a fairly recent innovation, a Premier League era concept intended to generate cash from sales of replica shirts, but The Tigers made use of a 3rd kit way back in 1971.

For much of early 1970s, City wore a traditional all white away kit when the amber shirts, black shorts and amber socks of the first choice strip were deemed too similar to the hues of a home side on our travels. In 1971/72, all white was used at Liverpool (League Cup), Swindon (League) and Norwich (FA Cup).

The Tigers also made use of a positively AC Milan-esque ensemble as an alternate away kit. It comprised of red and black striped shirts, black shorts and black socks with red bands. We wore this combination against Cardiff in a 1-1 draw in August 1971, then in another one-all at Blackpool in December and in a 2-2 draw at Oxford United in March 1972 (shown below as Ken Wagstaff takes a tumble).

It is curious that we didn’t use the white away kit at Oxford, even against Cardiff City we may have gotten away with all white despite The Bluebirds wearing white shorts with blue shirts, as referees were a lot less picky about teams wearing the same colour shorts in that era.

Still, this largely overlooked outfit adds to the richness of our kit history, it is rare for a team who often play in shirts with black stripes worn with black shorts and socks to get to wear another such kit featuring a colour not on their regular palette, and this is a kit that could only really be used in years when our home kit is of the plain amber shirted variety.

Illustration kindly supplied by John Devlin of the ace True Colours Football Kits